Over at Nashville is Talking, the question has been posed: Why isn’t prostitution legal? prompted by this post which speculates that sex workers might be safer if it was. Would that solve all kinds of problems? e.g. lower levels of disease and crimes against the women who engage in prostitution?
Despite the fact that I’m generally in favor of the free market – including the selling of personal services, I’m very dubious indeed about the legalisation of prostitution. Is it for moral reasons? Yes, it is. But it’s not about sex. It’s about the way that we treat workers on the bottom rung of the economic ladder.
Those who favor the legalistation of prostitution and the heavy regulation of the sex workers and their places of work probably have the right idea in principle, but not in practice. Prostitutes are the lowest of the low – they always have been. Legalising the trade has never made that different. I mean how many women who’ve managed to get out of the sex biz now have their time as prostitutes proudly displayed on their resume*? Even in countries where prostitution is legal. (Despite the fact that engaging in this kind of work successfully demands a whole array of marketable skills – flexibility, customer service and a sharp judge of human nature). Sure, a few whores manage to attain some sort of social standing and they’re called courtesans or heterae or geisha and offer companionship as well as sexual services. But these are a rare breed indeed – how many of us could charge just for the pleasure of our company and maybe a little singing or tea pouring?
In countries where prostitution is legal and regulated (e.g. the Netherlands) the sex work force isn’t overwhelmingly happy hookers. No, it’s the foreign sex workers who may or may not be there willingly, the drug addicted and the grossly misfortunate. Regular blood tests don’t change this and the people who manage these workers (pimps, if you will) don’t care about the personal development of their employees. This is a dead end job which usually results in that dead end quite early. And these are workers in a highly regulated, partly socialised economy where there are well-established mechanisms for investigating work place safety. The sex trades in London and Amsterdam and other big cities in Europe are well stocked with sex slaves from Eastern Europe and South East Asia and Africa. Do you really think that people who would enslave young women and boys are into complying with red tape and regulation? These folks are criminal scum and they’ll find ways to get around regulation just as they find ways to get around the existing legislation against prostitution, pimping and slavery.
What about the US? Do you think America is geared up to regulate the sex trade? Under the Bush administration work place safety and regulation has been gutted. And that’s for respectable trades like mining or utility ditch digging or meat packing – not for the morally dubious business of sex for sale. Can you really see the religious right prioritising the physical and mental welfare of prostitutes when the Republican party has resisted supporting workers and maintaining an objective, adult attitude to sex?
No. My reasons for objecting to legalisation of prositution is that I don’t think it will make much, if any, difference to the safety of sex workers and may make it more difficult to pursue the criminals behind the worst practices in the trade.
______
*update: – well, here’s one example – but I reckon that’s pretty unusual.
The Vol Abroad 