Vacation update 3 Frida Kahlo

Today, the Vol-in-law says, was not an unadulterated success. First off it’s raining and has been all day. Sometimes it slacks off to a drizzle but it hasn’t ever quit.

So today it was indoor stuff art museum followed by swimming (almost always an indoor activity here). The Tate Modern has a special exhibit of Frida Kahlo’s work. I love it, but the ViL is not a big fan. I can’t say I got any great new insights but her pictures are compelling and they make me want to dig out my paints and create. The gallery captions emphasised the political symbology of her works something I hadn’t much noticed before (she and her painter husband Diego Rivera were communists and Frida even had an affair with Leon Trotsky before he met his sticky end) but I often felt that the captions over emphasised the political and sought for it where it may not have been. Kahlo’s art is generally too self obsessed to focus much on politics. But one thing her work does do is capture the exuberance and magic realism of Mexico.

Post museum we walked nearly two miles in the rain uphill one way to find that the showers had flooded and there was no access to the pool. To compensate for no swimming we decided to go to the fancy French food hall to get some cake. I thought I’d get some lettuce too but didn’t see any on the produce table. I asked for some but the French help just stared at me. Lettuce I said. Lettuce.

“I can’t understand you,” she said. I couldn’t think of any other way to say lettuce to make it any clearer. I couldn’t think of a way to mime lettuce though I was moving my hands in a vaguely upsweeping leafy way. I couldn’t remember the French word for lettuce (is it le lettuce said with a French accent?) “Salad” I finally said.

“No, we don’t have any lettuce” she said.

British muslim institutions failing to deal with extremism?

I missed it last night, but the BBC’s Panorama news/documentary program A question of leadership put forward the argument that “mainstream” Muslim organisations, like the Muslim Council of Britain, were failing to deal with extremists in their midst. (Transcripts available on BBC site.)

Here’s something about it from The Times:

THE most powerful Islamic organisation in Britain has accused the BBC of
persecution after a documentary said that it was in denial about sectarianism in
its communities.
A Panorama documentary broadcast on BBC One last night
suggested that the (MCB) should provide a stronger lead and that groups
affiliated to it peddle hardline views.

The MCB is an umbrella organisation with more than 400 affiliated groups.
They include Ahl-e-Hadith, which has a British base in Birmingham and 41
branches across the country. According to the documentary one part of its
website exhorts its followers to “be different from Jews and Christians”, whose
“ways are based on sick or deviant views concerning their societies”.

My sense is that anti-semitism is common among British Muslims. One Muslim I know told me straight to my face “I don’t like Jews”. I was shocked, and to my shame, didn’t challenge this as aggressively as I should have (though I did express displeasure).

So what is the Muslim Council of Britain’s response? To lable the BBC “pro-Israeli”. That is such a laugh. If anything, I would say that the BBC has long had a pro-Arabist bent, and the chattering classes in England (from which the BBC draws its staff, largely) have often been overtly pro-Palestinian. You can read their long and rambling response to the program on their website www.mcb.org.uk (but I couldn’t find a permanent link to the full statement).

Part of the problem here, I think, is that the Muslim College of Britain, doesn’t see extremism in the same way that many Britons do. Extremism to the MCB appears to mean fomenting or committing acts of violence on British soil, but not elsewhere (maybe elsewhere in Europe, they did seem to come out against the Madrid Atocha bombings). Nor does their view of extremism seem to cover hateful speech against other segments of our society (namely Jews, but also homosexuals). And they certainly don’t seem to think that religion should be part of the private, not the public sphere. That’s something they seem to be in agreement with Tom DeLay, Bill Frist and others who are involved in Justice Sunday type events.

For more info on this from other, better commentators:
MCB watch
Harry’s Place (a post specifically about this Panorama program)